« Contrasting fortunes | Main | Posters on the underground »

January 26, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5503069b88834010536f78aa3970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Trusting my working class gut:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Anjali

Lovely post Mark. Very personal and rings so true because of that. But aside from that, I say go for your gut feeling, definitely. Sometimes that just can't be beat.

Charles

A brilliant, brilliant post Mark. Respect.

neilperkin

Spot on Mark. Great post.

Ramzi Yakob

Very nice. The question is whether or not you have the sort of relationship with your clients where they'll trust you enough that the gut feeling minus the data to support it is enough to spend their annual marketing budget on (or at least their Q1 budget).

Its a lovely sentiment - but the fact of it is is that the average person DOES know about Gorilla etc. My girlfriend from Newcastle doesn't know what accounts I work on and called me up last week asking me if I'd seen the weird kids do the eyebrows thing on TV. She's not even from Newcastle, she's from Cramlington which is nothing more than roundabouts and low cost housing - and she had seen eyebrows, and had spent an evening in the pub with her friends trying to recreate it, with a mobile phone handy to document their efforts. When you can't afford Sky's TV packages - sometimes a really fun ad is enough to fill an evening.

I agree that there is too much conceptual bullshit which goes on and no doubt even the popular ads have this same BS behind them. To my girlfriend, and your dad - the BS doesn't matter - all that matters is its funny/a bit weird/slightly unusual i.e. they notice it for any number of positive reasons.

100% go with your gut feeling more - its just a matter of learning how to sell it.

Good luck!

Mark Hadfield

Thanks for the comments everyone.

Ramzi - very true what you say about clients and their budgets. Whatever they profess, the majority of them are driven by numbers. If true creative content means they get to hit their numbers then fine, but it always comes back to the numbers. The numbers and the people who are ruled by the numbers are the gatekeepers of true creative content. That's obvious of course, especially when we live in a consumerist world.

There are probably 3 types of ads: 1) Ones that excite people and get talked about for the right reasons (Gorilla, Eyebrows), 2) Ones that annoy people and get talked about (regardless of whether it's for a good reason) (confused.com, churchill etc) and 3) Ones that elicit no discernible response from anyone. Clients want 1, 2, then 3 - in that order.

Now, ask 'normal' people like my dad and your girlfriend and they may be able to describe the odd one from 1), a couple from 2, and none from 3. The problem we have as marketers is that I'd say 3 is where most output sits. Why does it sit there? Well, I'd say not because of a lack of thinking from agency-side, but from restrictive briefs from clients.

There needs to be a sea-change in the way clients think. They shouldn't be gatekeepers, they should be the ones that offer agencies magical briefs every time. Every brief should be an opportunity to really flex some creative thinking and to challenge norms.

Some would say they do this at the moment, but I'd argue against that to a certain degree. If a fake flashmob in Liverpool Street is lauded a year after ImprovEverywhere did the Grand Central Station thing, and 9 months after the Liverpool Street Rickroll thing then I'd say we're in trouble.

Clients should offer opportunities to shine, not fences to break through.

(I think I went off my point somewhere up there, but hey ho.)

Nick

Brilliant post, Mark.

Right at the end, you hint at what a practical application of your realisation might be: "Every agency needs a dad like mine working there."

Just interested to know whether this means that you believe in getting 'non-marketing people' into the room right at the very beginning to collaborate on the creation of advertising?

It's something I've been dying to try, just out of curiosity...

N

Mark Hadfield

Hi Nick,

I believe thinking from 'non-marketing people' can bring up some really good thinking, and can make existing thinking from the agency more robust.

One of my ex students at St. Martins looked into 'untraining' adults and the way they think, because the naive way children think can bring up some great insights. This is what agencies need.

I remember when Wayne Rooney first made an impact in the Premier League. There was this big thing about him being a raw talent, a bit rough, liable to do something both equally silly and inspirational. There was this fear that when he became a regular in the first team that he'd have that unpredictability coached out of him. That's what happens at some agencies. People replace natural raw, unchecked talent with more of a honed business talent. While there's a place for both, I think agencies have too many of the latter and not too many of the former.

Of course Focus Groups are there to give the opinion of the consumer, but why can't those consumers be an integral FULL TIME employee when working on an account? Why just dip in and out?

That's why interns and work placement people can supplement an agency really well - they ask questions that others don't ask. They need to be rewarded for that, and certainly not fear asking 'silly' questions.

Come the revolution!

Shib

Great post Mark! Living in the Midlands I can really relate to what you are saying. The average viewer doesn't understand the strategy that goes into an ad, they see and (sometimes) undestand the end execution. I feel sometimes as an industry we complicate something that we can get across very simply.

Ha and I'll second the call for a revolution! I've alway's suprised people during a placement, sometimes it just take's an outside view to solve a problem.

Andrew Robinson

Loved the post Mark. As a fellow ex-working class North East-er who's rapidly turning into a soft southener I totally get where you're coming from. Working client-side, instead of the dad test I often use the mum test to see if it's something my mum would buy/do. I think gut instinct is something you develop over time. But it's not innate - it's the culmination of all your experiences, both professional and personal. Background counts a lot for this - and coming from such an excellent part of the world I think your gut instinct will be right most of the time, as is mine!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment